This settlement is just another example of what goes on in the financial world: lots of fraud/criminal activity, but regulators give those involved a slap on the wrist with fines that are just figured in as a “cost of doing business”, and the fraud continues virtually unabated with no one held responsible. The number of financial companies that have been found guilty of fraudulent activities over the past 6 or 7 years is outrageously high, with multiple repeat offenders (JPMorgan, Bank of America, Citigroup, etc., the list is long ) and the only thing even more outrageous is the fact that Wall Street and the banks are allowed to continue the same fraudulent activity with no criminal indictments of those involved and no admission of guilt. Hopefully, that is changing and the arrests will shortly start appearing. –Dennis
BENTONVILLE, Ark. — Wal-Mart Stores here said Tuesday that it is opposed to the proposed settlement of a civil antitrust lawsuit against Visa, MasterCard and their card-issuing banks.
“Wal-Mart, along with a growing number of consumer groups and merchants, is disappointed in the proposed credit card interchange fee settlement,” the company said in a statement. “The proposed settlement would not structurally change the broken market or prohibit credit card networks from continually increasing hidden swipe fees, which already cost consumers tens of billions of dollars each year.”
As previously reported, the card companies would pay more than $6 billion and provide an additional $1.2 billion in estimated value to retailers in reduced fees for a limited time to settle claims that they conspired to set interchange fees. The suit was first filed in 2005 and included several individual plaintiffs as well as a large class of retailers.
The National Association of Convenience Stores also said it is opposed to the settlement, but Kroger Co., Cincinnati, told SN last week it was in favor of it, saying it opens the door for retailers to steer customers to lower-cost forms of payment.
Wal-Mart said it opposed conditions of the settlement that it said would prevent retailers from taking action against the card companies for future “detrimental conduct or acts,” and said the settlement would also constrain innovation in “emerging payment” systems.
“As Wal-Mart continues to seek reform that will provide transparency and true competition among financial institutions, we encourage all merchants to put consumers first and reject the settlement,” the company said.
Last week Minneapolis-based Target Corp. also said it opposed the settlement, saying it was “bad for both retailers and consumers” and that it would “perpetuate a broken system.”
Related posts:
- Alleged Wal-Mart pepper-spray attacker turns herself in to police
- Monsanto’s Bt GMO corn to be sold at Wal-Mart with no indication it is genetically modified
- Mortgage Settlement Enforcement Monitor Claims Bank Leaders Are Lying to Him
- Common Dreams Staff ~ ‘Mortgage Settlement’ Funds Paying for Prisons, Not Foreclosure Relief
- Record settlement for West Virginia mine explosion
